Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> In article <3d7e1eaa@news.povray.org> , "Timothy R. Cook" 
> <tim### [at] scifi-fantasycom> wrote:
> 
>>Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>>
>>>Gwen & Emory Stagmer wrote:
>>>
>>>>The effect looks like some kind of scan line error.
>>>
>>>POV-Ray is a ray tracer, not a scanline renderer.  [snip]
>>
>>The lad said 'looks like', not 'is'.
> 
> 
> I suppose that depends on how you interpret the whole sentence, not just two
> words of it ... you can either interpret as "looks like some kind of scan
> line" or "looks like some kind of scan line error".  I used the second, you
> the first interpretation...

Eh...wtf

I interpret it to be 'looks like some kind of error of the type a scan
line render would produce', which seems to be what he meant.  You are
seeming to interpret it to be 'looks like an error that only scan line
renderers produce'.

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message